Problem Set 1

Investment Theory

Instructions: This problem set is due on Wednesday 9/9 at 11:59 pm CST and is an individual assignment. All problems must be handwritten. Scan your work and submit a PDF file.

Problem 1 Exactly one year ago, Maria paid $1,020 for a corporate bond with a face value of $1,000. During the year she collected two semiannual coupon payments totaling $60 in interest. Today, with market yields slightly higher than when she bought it, she sold the bond for $995. What holding-period return did Maria earn over the year?

Problem 2 Nadia is evaluating a one-year stake in a private real-estate deal. A year from now the deal will be wound up and its proceeds paid out: if the anchor tenant renews its lease, investors receive $260,000; if the tenant walks away, they receive $120,000. Nadia judges the two outcomes equally likely. Her only alternative is to hold one-year Treasury bills, which pay 4% with certainty. She values the stake by discounting its expected proceeds at the return she requires.

  1. Nadia demands a risk premium of 7% over the T-bill rate to bear this uncertainty, so her required return is 4\% + 7\% = 11\%. What is the most she should be willing to pay for the stake?
  2. Suppose the stake is offered at exactly the price you found in part a. What expected rate of return would Nadia earn?
  3. Now suppose Nadia instead demands a risk premium of 10%, so her required return is 4\% + 10\% = 14\%. What is the most she should be willing to pay?

Problem 3 Shares of Delta Robotics trade today at $60, and the company just paid its annual dividend of $1.20. An analyst covering the stock lays out three scenarios for the coming year, each with its own forecast for the year-end share price and the dividend paid over the year:

State of the Market Probability Dividend Price
Expansion 0.25 $2.00 $75
Steady growth 0.45 $1.50 $62
Downturn 0.30 $0.50 $48

Compute the mean and standard deviation of the one-year return on Delta Robotics stock.

Problem 4 Two companies serve the outdoor-recreation market: RainCo, which sells rain gear, and SunCo, which sells sunscreen and beach equipment. Next year’s weather can turn out wet, normal, or dry, and you assess the probabilities and the resulting year-end share prices as follows. RainCo trades at $20 today and SunCo at $25; neither pays a dividend.

Weather Probability RainCo price SunCo price
Wet 0.3 $30 $26
Normal 0.4 $22 $25
Dry 0.3 $16 $28
  1. Compute the expected return of each stock.
  2. Compute the standard deviation of returns for each stock.
  3. Compute the covariance and the correlation between the two stocks’ returns.

Problem 5 Your preferences over end-of-year wealth are described by the logarithmic utility function u(W) = \ln W, and your savings currently amount to $13,000. All of that wealth is tied up in a single volatile position that, over the coming year, is equally likely to gain $3,000 or lose $3,000. For a fee of $400 you can buy a hedge today that locks in your wealth and removes the risk entirely.

  1. Do you buy the hedge, or do you carry the position unhedged? Support your answer by comparing expected utilities.
  2. Suppose you carried the position unhedged, the bad outcome occurred, and your savings fell to $10,000. You are now offered the very same position for the year ahead and the very same $400 hedge. Do you buy the hedge this time? Explain what changed, given that neither the size of the gamble nor the price of the hedge did.

Problem 6 A vineyard owner’s entire net worth of $200,000 is invested in next season’s crop. The weather over the growing season determines the outcome: with probability 5% a hailstorm destroys most of the harvest and her net worth falls to $20,000; with probability 15% a late frost causes partial damage and her net worth falls to $120,000; and with probability 80% the season is normal and her net worth stays at $200,000. Her utility over net worth is logarithmic, u(W) = \ln W. A crop-insurance policy would pay $180,000 after a hailstorm, $80,000 after a frost, and nothing in a normal season. What is the most she would be willing to pay for this policy?

Problem 7 A songwriter has died, and the rights to her music catalog, valued at $500,000, are disputed by two former collaborators. Ana currently has no wealth, while Beto has $20,000. Neither can prove sole authorship, so they can take the matter to court, but whoever is awarded the catalog will pay legal costs equal to 20% of its value. The judge must award the entire catalog to one of them; a split ruling is not possible. Both Ana and Beto have the same utility function over wealth, U(W) = W^{1/2}.

  1. Ana and Beto both agree that Ana has a 70% chance of prevailing in court and Beto a 30% chance. Should they litigate, or is there a settlement that makes both better off? If a settlement exists, give one.
  2. Now suppose Ana and Beto are each overconfident, and both believe they have an 80% chance of winning. Does a mutually beneficial settlement still exist? Explain what drives the change.