The Impact of Dividends

Options, Futures and Derivative Securities

Lorenzo Naranjo

Spring 2026

Assets Paying Cash Dividends

Put-Call Parity with Dividends

  • For European options written on dividend paying stocks, the put-call parity is modified as follows: C - P = S - D - K e^{-r T} where D is the present value of dividends paid during the life of the option.
  • In order to derive this expression we will proceed as before by trying to build a covered call in two different ways.

Building a Covered Call

  • Use the same two strategies as for non-dividend paying stocks.
  • Strategy A: Long stock and short call \begin{align*} \text{Cost} & = S - C \\ \text{Payoff} & = \begin{cases} S_{T} + \textit{FV}(D) & \text{if $S_{T} \leq K$} \\ K + \textit{FV}(D) & \text{if $S_{T} > K$} \end{cases} \end{align*}
  • Strategy B: Long bond and short put \begin{align*} \text{Cost} & = K e^{-r T} - P \\ \text{Payoff} & = \begin{cases} S_{T} & \text{if $S_{T} \leq K$} \\ K & \text{if $S_{T} > K$} \end{cases} \end{align*}
  • Both strategies no longer have the same payoff at maturity because the stock pays dividends.

Adjusting Strategy A

  • Strategy A: Long stock, borrow D and short call \begin{align*} \text{Cost} & = S - D - C \\ \text{Payoff} & = \begin{cases} S_{T} & \text{if $S_{T} \leq K$} \\ K & \text{if $S_{T} > K$} \end{cases} \end{align*}
  • Strategy B: Long bond and short put \begin{align*} \text{Cost} & = K e^{-r T} - P \\ \text{Payoff} & = \begin{cases} S_{T} & \text{if $S_{T} \leq K$} \\ K & \text{if $S_{T} > K$} \end{cases} \end{align*}
  • Note that in A we use the dividends, reinvested at r, to repay the loan and generate the same payoff as in B.

Example 1

  • Suppose that S = 110, r = 5\%, K = 110, T = 9 months, and C = 13.30.
  • The stock is expected to pay dividends of $2 in 6 months, and $2.5 in 1 year.
  • What should be the no-arbitrage price of a European put with the same strike and maturity as the European call?
  • The present value of the relevant dividends is: D = 2 e^{-0.05 \times 6/12} = 1.95
  • Then, according to put-call parity we should have that: P = 13.30 - 110 + 1.95 + 110 e^{-0.05 \times 9/12} = 11.20

Example 2

  • What if in the previous example everything stays the same, but you find that the put trades for $11?
    • Then we have an arbitrage opportunity since the put is relatively cheap compared to what it should trade.
    • Hence, we should buy the put and sell the synthetic put. Note that the stock will pay a dividend of $2 in six months that can be used to pay the loan at that time.

Example 2 (cont’d)

Transactions T = 0 T = 6/12 T = 9/12, S_{T} \leq 110 T = 9/12, S_{T} > 110
Long put -11.00 0 110 - S_{T} 0
Short call 13.30 0 0 -(S_{T} - 110)
Long stock -110.00 2 S_{T} S_{T}
Borrow D 1.95 -2 0 0
Short bond 105.95 0 -110 -110
Total 0.20 0 0 0

Lower Bound on European Options with Cash Dividends

  • With dividends, we modify the lower bounds on European call and put options as follows: \begin{align*} C & \geq \max(S - D - K e^{-r T}, 0) \\ P & \geq \max(K e^{-r T} - S + D, 0) \end{align*}
  • As for the case with no dividends, these results are a consequence of put-call parity and the fact the option premium is never negative.

Example 3

  • Suppose that you have S = 110, r = 5\%, K = 110, and T = 9 months.
  • The stock is expected to pay dividends of $2 and $2.5, in six and twelve months, respectively.
  • The previous result implies that: C \geq \max(110 - 2 e^{-0.05 \times 6/12} - 110 e^{-0.05 \times 0.75}, 0) = 2.10
  • Note that we only include the dividend paid in 6 months since the maturity of the option is 9 months.
  • Also note that the bound is lower than the bound for an otherwise equivalent option written on a non-dividend paying stock.
    • For European options you can only purchase the stock at maturity and therefore you miss the dividend paid in 6 months.

Upper Bound on European Options with Cash Dividends

  • Since the payoffs of strategies A and B described above are positive, the cost of both strategies must be positive.
  • Therefore, if the asset pays cash dividends, the upper bounds on European call and put options are as follows: \begin{align*} C & \leq S - D \\ P & \leq K e^{-r T} \end{align*}

Example 4

  • Suppose that you have S = 110, r = 5\%, K = 110, and T = 9 months.
  • The stock is expected to pay dividends of $2 and $2.5, in six and twelve months, respectively.
  • The previous result implies that: C \leq 110 - 2 e^{-0.05 \times 6/12} = 108.05
  • Hence, no matter how high the volatility is on this European call option with strike $110 and maturity 9 months, its premium must be less than $108.05.

Assets Paying a Dividend Yield

The Dividend Yield

  • There are many assets that pay dividends continuously, like a currency, or that can be modeled as such, like a stock index.
  • In these cases it is convenient to model dividends as a percentage yield paid over time.
  • We will denote the continuously-compounded dividend yield by \delta.
  • Over each short interval \Delta t, the asset pays a dividend of \delta S_{t} \Delta t.
  • Therefore, the dividend yield can be seen as the units of the asset growing over time at the rate \delta.
  • In practice, this is the approach used to model options on stock indices and currencies, although some practitioners also use it to model individual stocks as well.

Put-Call Parity with a Dividend Yield

  • For European options written on assets paying a dividend yield, the put-call parity is modified as follows: C - P = S e^{-\delta T} - K e^{-r T} where \delta is the dividend yield paid continuously by the asset during the life of the option.
  • In order to derive this expression we will proceed as before by trying to build a covered call in two different ways.

Two Strategies with the Same Payoff

  • Strategy A: Long e^{-\delta T} units of the asset and short call \begin{align*} \text{Cost} & = S e^{-\delta T} - C \\ \text{Payoff} & = \begin{cases} S_{T} & \text{if $S_{T} \leq K$} \\ K & \text{if $S_{T} > K$} \end{cases} \end{align*}
  • Strategy B: Long bond and short put \begin{align*} \text{Cost} & = K e^{-r T} - P \\ \text{Payoff} & = \begin{cases} S_{T} & \text{if $S_{T} \leq K$} \\ K & \text{if $S_{T} > K$} \end{cases} \end{align*}
  • Note that in A the asset grows at the rate \delta, so the total number of “units” of the asset at maturity is e^{-\delta T} e^{\delta T} = 1.

Example 5

  • Suppose that S = 110, r = 5\%, \delta = 3\%, K = 110, T = 9 months, and C = 13.30.
  • What should be the no-arbitrage price of a European put with the same strike and maturity as the European call?
  • According to put-call parity we should have that a European put with the same strike and maturity as the call should cost: P = 13.30 - 110 e^{-0.03 \times 9/12} + 110 e^{-0.05 \times 9/12} = 11.70.

Example 6

  • What if in the previous example everything stays the same, but you find that the put trades for $11?
  • Then we have an arbitrage opportunity since the put is relatively cheap compared to what it should trade.
  • Hence, we should buy the put and sell the synthetic put.
Transactions T = 0 T = 9/12, S_{T} \leq 110 T = 9/12, S_{T} > 110
Long put -11.00 110 - S_{T} 0
Short call 13.30 0 -(S_{T} - 110)
Long e^{-\delta T} units of asset -107.55 S_{T} S_{T}
Short bond 105.95 -110 -110
Total 0.70 0 0

Lower Bound on European Options with Dividend Yields

  • If the asset pays a dividend yield, we modify the lower bounds on European call and put options as follows: \begin{align*} C & \geq \max(S e^{-\delta T} - K e^{-r T}, 0) \\ P & \geq \max(K e^{-r T} - S e^{-\delta T}, 0) \end{align*}
  • As for the case with no dividends, these results are a consequence of put-call parity and the fact the option premium is never negative.

Example 7

  • Suppose that you have S = 110, r = 5\%, \delta = 3\%, K = 110, and T = 9 months.
  • The previous result implies that: C \geq \max(110 e^{-0.03 \times 9/12} - 110 e^{-0.05 \times 9/12}, 0) = 1.60
  • Hence, no matter how low the volatility is on this European call option with strike $110 and maturity 9 months, its premium must be higher than $1.60.

Upper Bound on European Options with Dividend Yields

  • Since the payoffs of strategies A and B described above are positive, the cost of both strategies must be positive.
  • Therefore, if the asset pays a dividend yield, the upper bounds on European call and put options are as follows: \begin{align*} C & \leq S e^{-\delta T} \\ P & \leq K e^{-r T} \end{align*}

Example 8

  • Suppose that you have S = 110, r = 5\%, \delta = 3\%, K = 110, and T = 9 months.
  • The previous result implies that: C \leq 110 e^{-0.03 \times 9/12} = 107.55
  • Hence, no matter how high the volatility is on this European call option with strike $110 and maturity 9 months, its premium must be less than $107.55.

Feasible Prices for European Call Options

  • The graph below describes the region of feasible prices for European call options written on an asset that pays a positive dividend yield such that \delta > r.
Call price against the stock price S for an asset paying a dividend yield. The shaded region of feasible prices lies between the upper bound, the dashed line S0 times e to the minus delta T, and the lower bound, the dashed line max of S times e to the minus delta T minus K times e to the minus rT, zero, which leaves zero at K times e to the minus r minus delta times T, to the right of K. The solid call payoff starts at K.

Feasible Prices for European Put Options

  • The graph below describes the region of feasible prices for European put options written on an asset that pays a positive dividend yield such that \delta > r.
Put price against the stock price S for an asset paying a dividend yield. The shaded region of feasible prices lies between the upper bound, a dashed horizontal line at K times e to the minus rT, and the lower bound, the dashed line max of K times e to the minus rT minus S times e to the minus delta T, zero, which reaches zero at K times e to the minus r minus delta times T, to the right of K. The solid put payoff reaches zero at K.